6th Century BC Heelstone Scroll Trench

Any other writing or publication topics

Moderator: rsutc

Garry Denke

6th Century BC Heelstone Scroll Trench

Postby Garry Denke » 2005 03 02 1221

***Stonehenge in its landscape; Twentieth-century excavations, Rosamund MJ Cleal, KE Walker, and R Montague, ENGLISH HERITAGE, 1995, ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT 10, ISBN: 1850746052, Pages 321-322, Figure 183-183 continued, Lieutenant-Colonel William Hawley's 1923 cross-section C6 of 9ft wide 33ft long WA3607 broad cut scroll trench to underneath Heelstone. Map of C6 cross-section at Page 269, Figure 156. Note: C6 cross-section at Pages 321-322; Figure 183-183 continued, shown reversed.***

Question No. 1.
Concerning the mapping of easternmost Posthole at A (the 4th blackened circle on most Stonehenge maps), located 18ft due west of the Heelstone's west side; Does anyone think it is right, or wrong, to solid line contour and blacken in on any map a posthole, such as the easternmost Posthole at A, cut away entirely by the subject 6th century BC Heelstone scroll trench, when such easternmost Posthole at A does not exist? (see Hawley's 1923 cross-section C6 in above publication: Pages 321-322; Figure 183-183 continued)

Question No. 2.
Concerning the mapping of Heelstone's western elder circular ditch 9ft missing portion (the thinnest darkened portion on most Stonehenge maps), located 13ft west-southwest of the Heelstone's west side; Does anyone think it is right, or wrong, to solid line contour and darken in on any map a ditch, such as Heelstone's western circular ditch 9ft missing portion, cut away entirely by the subject 6th century BC Heelstone scroll trench, when such elder circular ditch portion does not exist? (see Hawley's 1923 cross-section C6 in above publication; Pages 321-322; Figure 183-183 continued)

Question No. 3.
Why is the subject 6th century BC Heelstone scroll trench not mapped honoring the detailed sample descriptions of the original C6 cross-section creators, Lt.-Col. William Hawley and Robert Newall, on most Stonehenge maps? (see Hawley's 1923 cross-section C6 in above publication: Pages 321-322; Figure 183-183 continued)

Same original C6 cross-section at Salisbury and South Wiltshire Museum:
http://www.aboutbritain.com/SalisburyMuseum.htm?RefID=1504297

--

6th Century BC Heelstone Scroll Trench
Stonehenge in its landscape; Twentieth-century excavations, Rosamund MJ Cleal, KE Walker, and R Montague, ENGLISH HERITAGE, 1995, ARCHAEOLOGICAL REPORT 10, ISBN: 1850746052, Pages 321-322, Figure 183-183 continued, Lieutenant-Colonel William Hawley's 1923 cross-section C6 of 9ft wide 33ft long WA3607 broad cut scroll trench to underneath Heelstone. Map of C6 cross-section at Page 269, Figure 156. Note: C6 cross-section at Pages 321-322; Figure 183-183 continued, shown reversed. Lydian lion electrum coins (7) in WA3607 scroll trench, 1 recovered. Described in daily Journal No. 4 at Stonehenge on 19th May 1923. Remaining artifacts along and at 12ft bottom of Inigo Jones' Stone-Heng Restored scroll trench East of coined Heelstone elder circular ditch (missing). Gold ark (2.5c-1.5c-1.5c), gold table (2c-1c-1.5c), gold altar (1c-1c-2c), gold candlestick, gold breastplate, gold ephod, gold censer, and brass laver, all, inside brass altar (5c-5c-3c) located beneath Hawley's Helestone lion head, calf head, man face, and eagle wings (pictured below). Jones' brass altar (5c-5c-3c) top side at 7.5ft augered depth. Scrolling trench 9ft wide 33ft long description from Stonehole B (WA3606) to 12ft below Heelstone 96 (Stonehole 163) surface: BEGINNING at mapped Stonehole B (WA3606), THENCE deepening Northeast, THENCE cutting Easternmost Posthole at A (missing), through C6 cross-section right triangle at southwest side, and Heelstone elder circular ditch (missing), THENCE East pass Stonehole 97 disturbance at northern side to beneath Hawley's Helestone lion head, calf head, man face, and eagle wings. Artifacts below Denoco Inc.'s ATT refraction seismic station No. 96 (sledgehammer source) recorded at Stonehenge on 1st April 1985. Salisbury Museum and above publication maps contour 33ft long broad cut scroll trench short by 25ft showing WA3607 only 8ft long. Robert Newall's 1923 scroll trench map contour short of Hawley's cross-sections and scroll trench East side under Heelstone (embedded 4.5ft). Three 1985 refraction seismic lines confirm Hawley's cross-sections and 9ft wide 33ft long scroll trench length and depths. Denoco Inc.'s ATT two north-south lines traverse WA3607 scroll trench width, and one east-west cross line ties along its length. English Heritage's AMLab 75 Ohm-m^2/m 1994 resistivity survey (above publication: Figure 261; Page 500) traceplot of raw resistivity data confirms ATT refraction seismic recordings. Upload of coined 6th Century BC Heelstone Scroll Trench 1984 magnetic-electromagnetic (EM-GPR) and 1985 refraction seismic maps and cross-sections to follow shortly.

For MSN users:
http://groups.msn.com/stonehengewhitestones
http://groups.msn.com/arkarchaeology
http://groups.msn.com/stonehengegeologyandgeophysics
http://groups.msn.com/geomagnetism
http://groups.msn.com/paleomagnetism

For YAHOO users:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stonehengewhitestones
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/arkarchaeology
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/stonehengegeologyandgeophysics
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/geomagnetism
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/paleomagnetism

For FORUM users:
http://www.garrydenke.com/stonehenge.htm
http://www.freewebs.com/garrydenke
http://www.webspawner.com/users/garrydenke/index.html
http://www.geocities.com/garrydenke
http://www.garrydenke.bravehost.com

Discussion at this forum appreciated.

Garry W. Denke
Geologist/Geophysicist
Denoco Inc. of Texas
Wildcat Station, P.O. Box 866488
Plano, Texas 75086-6488
Tel: 972-422-8268
Fax: 972-423-6337
Cell: 940-521-1667

http://www.garrydenke.com
GarryDenke@garrydenke.com
http://www.denocoinc.com
GarryDenke@denocoinc.com

Garry Denke

Postby Garry Denke » 2005 11 19 1134

Here is the red tape that is currently holding up the recharging of Earth's magnetic field as it continues its decrease toward Tesla zero. On 26th July 2005 the Planning and Regulatory Panel of Salisbury District Council refused English Heritage's application for excavation and removal of A-344 road beside Heelstone:

http://www.english-heritage.org.uk/serv ... ebDoc.5437

English Heritage's application, approved by the Northern Area Committee of Salisbury District Council at its meeting of 19th July 2005, was refused by the Planning and Regulatory Panel of Salisbury District Council on 26th July 2005, because it did not provide for excavating and removing the Heelstone artifacts:

http://www.geocities.com/garrydenke

1) brass altar (5c-5c-3c)
2) gold ark (2.5c-1.5c-1.5c)
3) gold table (2c-1c-1.5c)
4) gold altar (1c-1c-2c)
5) gold candlestick
6) gold breastplate
7) gold ephod
8) gold censer
9) brass laver

http://www.garrydenke.com/seismic.htm

1) A-A' (1979) C91 quadrant bearing; N 73 E
2) B-B' (1953) C36 quadrant bearing; S 67 E
3) C-C' (1923) C6 quadrant bearing; S 57 E
4) D-D' (1923) C6 quadrant bearing; South
5) E-E' (1923) C6 quadrant bearing; S 50 E
6) F-F' (1923) C6 quadrant bearings; S 2 W - S 22 E
7) G-G' (1923) C6 quadrant bearing; S 50 E
8) H-H' (1956) C51 quadrant bearing; S 63 E
9) I-I' (1979) C91 quadrant bearings; S 71 E - S 34 E - S 71 E / S 71 E

http://www.salisbury.gov.uk/council/contact

English Heritage was very surprised, and disappointed, by Salisbury District Council's decision, but they now know the grounds for refusal are ones which can easily be resolved when English Heritage submits the amended scheme providing for the excavation and removal of the Heelstone artifacts and A-344 road.

http://www.gnn.gov.uk/content/detail.as ... eID=175616

The review will be taken forward by a steering group consisting of representatives from: the Department for Transport; the Department for Culture, Media and Sport; the Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs; the Highways Agency; the Government Office for the South West; and statutory advisers.

pen
Posts: 3
Joined: 2005 09 02 0236

Postby pen » 2005 11 25 0658

Anonymity of a SOCKS Proxy. As SOCKS (as it was already marked above) transfers all data from a client to a server, nothing adding from itself, from the point of view of a web-server, a socks proxy is a client. Therefore anonymity of this type of proxy servers is very high.: http://www.socksproxylist.com

Garry Denke

Postby Garry Denke » 2005 11 25 0901

pen wrote:Anonymity of a SOCKS Proxy.

http://www.thebritishmuseum.ac.uk/compa ... id=OBJ4379

The seven (7) sealed Lion punch marked electrum stater coins inside 6th century Heelstone scroll trench date its creation. Ezekiel, the Son of man, acquired the seven Lion sealed coins from what is now Western Turkey during his trip North before crossing Dover's sea of glass ice to Stonehenge. The first (1st) sealed Lion coin of Ezekiel's seven scroll trench seals was found by the late Robert Newall on 19th May 1923, at the intersection of scroll trench and the elder circular ditch (where it once was). Located two feet (2ft) East of the late Lieutenant-Colonel William Hawley's 19th May 1923 unexcavated C6 right-angled triangle hypotenuse center, at a depth of four and an half feet (4.5ft) below ground level (GL) surface, the Lion sealed coin confirmed the earliest possible date of the Son of man's scroll trenching to Altar (Heel) Stonehole 163. Historically then, the Son of man's sealed Lion sealed scroll trench's date could not be earlier than the 7th to 6th century BC, as determined from the Lion's production electrum stater coinage mint date range. The remaining six (6) Lion coins are sealed in the bottom of the Eastward deepening scroll trench, to the right hand of the beast (your left), at intervals measured from Newall's first (1st) Lion find at just under one Lion per cubit in the horizontal plane; but being more particularly described as follows:

BEGINNING at Ezekiel's (Son of man's) first (1st) Lion sealed coin found by Robert Newall on 19th May 1923, at the intersection of Heelstone scroll trench and the elder Heelstone circular ditch (where it once was), said Son of man's first (1st) Lion sealed coin found by Robert Newall being two feet (2ft) East of Lieutenant-Colonel William Hawley's 19th May 1923 unexcavated C6 right-angled triangle hypotenuse center, at a depth of four and a half feet (4.5ft) below ground level (GL) surface;
THENCE East one and an half feet (1.5ft) down scroll trench to EM detected second (2nd) Lion sealed coin;
THENCE East one and an half feet (1.5ft) down scroll trench to EM detected third (3rd) Lion sealed coin;
THENCE East two feet (2ft) down scroll trench to EM detected fourth (4th) Lion sealed coin;
THENCE East two feet (2ft) down scroll trench to EM detected fifth (5th) Lion sealed coin;
THENCE East two and an half feet (2.5ft) down scroll trench to EM detected sixth (6th) Lion sealed coin;
THENCE East two and an half feet (2.5ft) down scroll trench to EM detected seventh (7th) Lion sealed coin;
Stonehenge,
County of Wiltshire,
State of Great Britain,
United Kingdom.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stonehenge

"The Heel Stone (5), may also have been erected outside the north eastern entrance during this period although it cannot be securely dated and may have been installed at any time in phase 3." No argument with a Lion seal and dated wood: 'In 1953 Atkinson excavated calcareous wood from the 'foot of the stone' [Heelstone] at the bottom of C36 (see Map 1 and Cross-section B-B'). Carbon-14 dating of Atkinson's wood, measuring 80mm x 51mm x 19mm [English Heritage (Cleal, et al), 1995, page 463], determined Heelstone's eastern base set in the 7th-6th century BC. This coincides with the Lion seal 7th-6th century BC coin recovered by Newall from Heelstone's right hand (your left) scroll trench (see Map 1 and Cross-section F-F'). Because there is no phase 4 defined, Stonehenge phase 3 occurs through present. 7th-6th century BC is Heelstone's last setting.'

SOCKS

Greettat
Posts: 3
Joined: 2008 08 06 1918
Contact:

the bitterest of the bitter

Postby Greettat » 2008 10 01 1738

if you wish to be the best man, you must suffer the bitterest of the bitter.



-------------------------
evening dresses, evening gowns, wedding dresses, bridal gowns, wedding gowns


Return to “General Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests

cron